References
In this guide
In this guideThis is a paper for discussion. It does not reflect the views of the Committee and should not be cited.
Benigni R, Serafimova R, Parra Morte JM, Battistelli CL, Bossa C, Giuliani A, Fioravanzo E, Bassan A, Gatnik MF, Rathman J, Yang C, Mostrag-Szlichtyng A, Sacher O & Tcheremenskaia O, 2020. Evaluation of the applicability of existing (Q)SAR models for predicting the genotoxicity of pesticides and similarity analysis related with genotoxicity of pesticides for facilitating of grouping and read across: An EFSA funded project. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 114, 104658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104658
ECHA (European Chemicals Agency), 2017. Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF). European Chemicals Agency. Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF) - Publications Office of the EU
ECHA/EFSA (European Chemicals Agency/European Food Safety Authority), 2023. Guidance document on the impact of water treatment processes o nresidues of active substances or their metabolites in water abstracted for the production of drinking water. EFSA Journal, 21(8), 8194. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8194
EFSA CONTAM Panel (EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain), 2023. Risk assessment of N-nitrosamines in food. EFSA Journal, 21(3), 7884. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7884
EFSA FAF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings), 2021. Scientific Guidance for the preparation of applications on smoke flavouring primary products. EFSA Journal, 19(3), 6435. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6435
EFSA SC (EFSA Scientific Committee), 2018. Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments. EFSA Journal, 16(1), 5123. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123
EFSA SC (EFSA Scientific Committee), 2019. Guidance on the use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach in food safety assessment. EFSA Journal, 17(6), 5708. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5708
EFSA SC (EFSA Scientific Committee), 2025. Guidance on the use of read-across for chemical safety assessment in food and feed. EFSA Journal, 23(7), e9586. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9586
Irwan J, Simetska N, Wehr M, Kellner R & Escher SE, 2024. Read-Across Application for Food or Feed Ingredients. EFSA Supporting Publications, 21(7), EN-8811. https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-8811
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2017. Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals, Second Edition. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 194, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264274679-en
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2020a. Case study on the use of integrated approaches to testing and assessment for identification and characterisation of parkinsonian hazard liability of deguelin by an AOP-based testing and read across approach (ENV/JM/MONO(2020)22). OECD Publishing. Case study on the use of integrated approaches to testing and assessment for identification and characterisation of parkinsonian hazard liability of deguelin by an AOP-based testing and read across approach -pdf
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2020b. Case study on the use of integrated approaches to testing and assessment for mitochondrial complex-III mediated neurotoxicity of azoxystrobin - read-across to other strobilurins (ENV/JM/MONO(2020)23). OECD Publishing. Case study on the use of integrated approaches to testing and assessment for mitochondrial complex-III mediated neurotoxicity of azoxystrobin - read-across to other strobilurins-pdf
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2020c. Case study on the use of Integrated approaches to testing and assessment for read-across based filling of developmental toxicity data gap for methyl hexanoic acid (ENV/JM/MONO(2020)21). OECD Publishing. Case study on the use of Integrated approaches to testing and assessment for read-across based filling of developmental toxicity data gap for methyl hexanoic acid -pdf
Pestana CB, Firman JW & Cronin MTD, 2021. Incorporating lines of evidence from New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to reduce uncertainties in a category based read-across: A case study for repeated dose toxicity. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 120, 104855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104855